cro In an excerpt from the book “Best Play: Revolutionary Method for Finding the Strongest Move” Alexander Shashin describes one of the move-choice. In this ambitious and groundbreaking work, physicist and chess master Alexander Shashin presents the fruit of three decades of research into the elements of. A few weeks ago I purchased the book “Best Play: A New Method for Discovering the Strongest Move” by Alexander Shashin. For those of you.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||6.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Shashin and also to all the readers for those inaccuracies, which were inevitably made in mypopularizing of the main ideas of the new positional theory. The recipes are really not so difficult.
Shashin suggests to choose one of three possible algorithms of the game: Aoexander all sounds obvious enough, but how does it work in practice? And when Garry did not lose, he confirmed his absolute dominance over Karpov.
Vasily Byvshev Dedicated to eightieth birthday of Great Trainer. Konstantin Sakaev The Results of the Year. It is difficult to overestimate the amount of support he gave me.
I’d like to see software that only calculates mobility. As well as chessplayers, who have studied Chuzhakin system, and applied it in practice, will change their rating in a different ways. Petersburg, Russia, where he trains young international players.
chess playing algorithm for humans –
Due to computers the “specific” methodically started to kill the “general”. Is there a spot of light at the end of the tunnel?
It became clear that Karpov’s attempts to regain the title would never succeed. What have we got? Rxg7 Not many people have defeated the Great Viktor in a similar way But is it really that simple?
My third book was “The modern chess problems. A book of the St. Alekhine his ” selected games”. A very interesting review, I am sorry syashin I have only just chanced upon it.
Review: Best Play | ChessVibes
I am curious if other Forum members have taken the plunge to study the book and what value you have derived from it?
I’m still interested to hear from our Forum members who would care to share their thoughts. In those same four moves, though, he has acquired the black g7-pawn, plus the rook and the c4-knight.
September 05, I am very sorry to see their self-destructive actions. He’s like Euclid, who formulated the basic axioms. Not because I believe in the fallacy of the argument from authority, but because, well, I had simply never heard of him. Who is the author of this well written review The fact that my method is effective, I have already been saying in one of my previous conversations. This is from the same chapter on Tal: It’s really no “cheap” thinking.
A more practical way of reviewing such a book would be to look up its author’s Elo rating. They don’t calculate as much as visualize images.
Well, he alfxander ignores this altogether. The most brilliant players representing another kind of chess talent are Tal and Kasparov, who have a photographic memory and are unusually fast at calculation. The area of the smallest rectangle that contains these pieces is 6.
Two of them, the expansion factor in the form of a center of gravity; and packing density, are original, or, at least, I never seen them suggested by anyone else.
Chess is a very complicated system. I would like to go back to the first half of the XX-th century. And lastly, the main thing. It is time to pay attention of the readers to the hero of this article. Some very strong grandmasters don’t hesitate asking my advice. Good analysis doesn’t just give the right computer moves, or the prove of the author’s ideas; it also tells the story of the game.