ASTM E() – Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size Using Semiautomati. Purchase your copy of ASTM E – 97() as a PDF download or hard copy directly from the official BSI Shop. All BSI British Standards. The ASTM Designation: E–97 requires five hundred data points for a given sample and this analysis is time-consuming and tedious for the.
|Published (Last):||18 December 2008|
|PDF File Size:||19.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Detection of these features, particularly during measurement with an automatic image analyzer, will bias test results. Then, make enlargements of the grain structure images using the same enlarger setting.
Sieving Including test sieves and porosimetry.
If an excessively high number of grains are present in the image, measurement precision will be impaired. It should be recognized that slight differences in grain size ratings may be obtained using different methods because different aspects of the grain structure are being assessed. Methods based on the mean intercept length or the number of grain boundary intersections per unit length are directly related to the grain boundary surface area per unit volume, SV.
This value is equivalent to the mean lineal intercept length,? Each grain boundary cut by the test line is also counted as one intersection. Automatic image analyzers are affected by these problems to a greater degree than are semiautomatic digitizing tablet measurements. The grain structure is nearly completely revealed without the twin boundaries. The measurement area, Ati, is then determined by combining the grain boundary and grain interior images, if the number of grains per unit area is to be determined.
No further reproductions authorized. There may be other methods or alternate procedures that can produce acceptable results but they must be carefully evaluated before use see Prior to automatic image analysis, the grain boundaries should be thinned and the etch pitting must be removed. If the anisotropy index, or other descriptions of the grain shape, was determined see Annex A1report the value s for the plane or planes, or directions evaluated.
Alternatively, a greater number of micrographs can be made and analyzed. However, as with manual application of the Jeffries method, the tablet method also requires marking off of the grains in order to obtain an accurate count. If the cursor can be programmed to record each triple point intersection as 11? Only the length of the test lines intersecting the grains of interest are measured and the average intercept length and standard deviation are determined as described in paragraphs For such work, follow the counting rules described in Test Methods E Most digitizing tables have software programs established for such computations.
In general, coarse-grained specimens are more easily etched for prior-austenite grain size. The best possible sequence of specimen preparation and etching should be used before relying upon video techniques to further improve the image prior to detection.
Alternatively, the three mean lineal intercept lengths can be normalized divide each by the value of the smallest and the results expressed as ratios, as shown below.
When counting grain boundary intersections, which is usually easier, a tangential intersection with a grain boundary is counted as one intersection. A sufficient number of? For each of the three principle test planes, three directions perpendicular to those shown in Fig. A variety of approaches can be employed.
Prices subject to change without notice.
Then calculate the mean lineal intercept,? Use of a programmable stage prevents bias in? N can be entered into the computer program, or used with a hand calculator, to determine G. The cursor is moved over the tablet surface and the microscopist can see the illuminated cross hairs in the cursor through the eyepieces over the? Specimens must be carefully cleaned and dried after polishing.
However, because of the tedious nature of this analysis, for a sufficiently large number of grains to achieve adequate statistical precision, this method is not recommended.
A third approach is to transfer the microstructural image, test grid image and cursor image to a television monitor. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. The mean lineal intercept length of the phase of interest,? In this case, the grain size must be determined on longitudinal, transverse, and planar surfaces, or radial and transverse surfaces, depending on the product shape, and averaged, as described in Annex A1, to obtain the mean grain size.
Again, this technique works best with relatively coarse-grained steels. However, to eliminate grain anisotropy effects non-equiaxed grainseither the image should be rotated using a prism to rotate the live image, or the digitized image can be rotated in memory, or scan lines of several orientations may be used, depending upon the capabilities of the image analyzer used.
Tape the grid corners to the micrograph or tablet surface to prevent movement during measurement. Grains intersecting the test area border must be deleted see Table 1. If each P to a mean lineal intercept length using Eq 5, and the mean?
The presence of twin boundaries can be tolerated when semiautomatic digitizing tablets are utilized qstm measurement errors are more likely to occur. However, these techniques must be used with caution because skeletonization can produce false grain boundaries and watershed segmentation may not produce grain boundaries between two adjacent grains with similar color or gray level.
ASTM E1382 – 97(2015)
Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard. The grain interiors are detected as xstm in Moderate image editing is required. Counting accuracy will be impaired if the number of grains visible is excessively high smaller apparent size in the? L is the number of grain boundary intersections per unit length.
Excessive relief, pitting or pullout must be avoided. Similar results can be obtained using alkaline sodium picrate, boiling or electrolytically.
In wstm case, the average number of intercepts or intersections should be at least 25 per circle. Excessively deep etching with such etchants to bring out the fainter boundaries should not be done because deep etching creates excessive relief deviation from planar conditions and will bias certain measurements, satm grain intercept lengths and grain areas, performed by automatic image analysis and also measurements made with a digitizing tablet.
A values for the? The nature of the heat treatment is usually important, particularly the tempering temperature, if used.