This has been due, in no small degree, to the influence of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s critically acclaimed Epistemology of the Closet. Working from classic texts of. Epistemology of the Closet has ratings and 54 reviews. Khush said: ‘ Epistemology of the closet’ is an informative and interesting book. It is i. Buy Epistemology of the Closet 2Rev Ed by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery.
|Published (Last):||24 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||13.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the end, I must add that the chapters on Proust and Wilde can still be enjoyed even if one has not read them.
Epistemology of the Closet – Wikipedia
Well, Sedgwick herself married a man, Hal Sedgwick, though she would not have used the term “straight”, seeing sexual identity as a continuum rather than a category. It will be intensely rewarding to some and perplexingly frustrating to others. I have a Mormon friend whose parents told tthe that while he is entitled to love whoever he chooses, they condemn the homosexual act.
I sedgwwick it, later, as a rather embarrassing phase, best forgotten or else laughed away, to do with being a tomboy, whatever that meant. And if queer is anything, it’s a retort to the idea that your sexual or any identity must define you in a static, limiting way, and above all, that it may be used to vilify you. Also how we all bear otherness in ourselves and xenophobia is fear of BEING the strange rather than a seperated out fear of the strange.
To ask other readers questions about Epistemology of the Closetplease sign up. I would read an entire thesis on that. I really enjoyed this book since it presents such an important and useful work of modern Queer theory, but also because it goes beyond the realm of such theory, and towards the idea that the concept of sexuality and its identification is an ever changing issue that is greatly affected by the social and political factors present within any era.
She’s not fighting “for” “the homosexual” as much as attempting to deconstruct the social binaries that themselves invariably result in concrete binaries. Probably everyone should read it, or something like it to show how culture is constituted of open secrets and unacknowledged episteology of various types of “others”.
Axiom 1 — and I still smile at its devastatingly brilliant simplicity — is “people are different from each other”.
This is a book written by an academic, aimed at other professional academics. I have been recently seeing a guy from Venezuela who is only in the process of coming out. University of California Pr Amazon. La Rochefoucauld wrote “There are some people who would never have fallen in love if they had not heard there was such a thing” – does the same go for hate as goes for love?
Being “in” the closet is perceived as living a false, sham half-life – it isn’t living. I would recommend the introduction and first chapter to everyone seriously, everyonebut the rest of the book only to those working academically on sexuality in literature.
He hasn’t come out to his parents, but has come out to his American friends and classmates, as well as some of his close female cousins. Working from classic texts of European and It’s worth quoting a few in full: On one hand, I feel glad reading, for instance, about the episteme of the ‘closet,’ it gives the impression that mankind is evolving in a linear fashion.
Feb 22, John Gardner rated it it was ok. View all 11 comments. It shows a young episstemology standing next to a young girl, both wearing dresses complete with frills and ruffles. Get used to it! These two views can also be applied to divisions of people based on gender, skin color, ethnicity, nationality, religion, socio-economic status, and so forth. My library Help Advanced Book Search.
This book reflects the huge AIDS crisis among gay men in the s, and the forms of homophobia around at that time – to understand some of the tonalities and cognitive structures of the book you must know the context. Additionally, she theorizes that “male homosexual panic became the normal condition of male heterosexual entitlement” As is often my problem, it is difficult to review a book so seminal a self-conscious word choice, not ignoring the potential for “germinal” to be used as a synonym and so fundamental to so many strains of thoughts.
James Russell Lowell Prize Nominee The reality of the matter is that the full on closet value and definition, in my personal point of view, is the hegemonic heteronormative cushion for society to exclude and excuse other forms of existence. Probably everyone should read it, or something like it to show how cu An interesting book. What was this about?
Epistemology of the Closet
Others had imaginary friends, or teddies with personalities. Nov 11, Zacharygs rated it really liked it.
In this highly acclaimed work, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick proposed a new mode of literary and cultural critique that destabilized a Western structural binary, in this case not a gendered one e. How would someone grow to hate themselves or to hate others for their differences, episstemology someone aeons ago had not given voice, conceived of such a word, as defines something to be hated? I was a bit taken aback by the rather brash out-casting in this day and age, and a bit shocked that there is still so much hatred and misunderstanding in the world today.
This is a tour-de-force examination of epistemological questions as they arise from and pertain to the closet – in which homosexual may live sheltered, private lives.
eplstemology Ti Fairly early on Sedgwick characterizes this project, in lieu of a warning of sorts, as ‘not pellucid’. The first book to grab me was the Butler, and this was mainly because of the resonance of the sepia-toned image on the cover of my Routledge edition, which mirrored that photograph from my childhood.
Epistemology of the Closet – Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick – Google Books
I suppose it must have been the rise of religion that gave voice to the prudish hatred for the sexual act. In countless personal gay narratives, one often hears, ‘Oh I thought I were the only one,’ ‘this is only happening to me.
I was very fascinated with the way the author expressed they way in which the closet was stablished her point of view and understanding of the closet as an epistemology. Overall a very good critical analysis of the idea of the closet at the time it was written and probably still today. Return to Book Page. The chapter dedicated to the king of obscurity is the one closest to ‘pure’ literary analysis. What I find amazing in my updated edition fromis what had happened since the book’s first conception at the end of the s – and this last edition.
Sep 16, Oscar rated it it was amazing. The article later goes on to describe how “Her close readings of Melville’s ” Billy Budd “, Wilde’s ” Dorian Gray ” and of Proust, Nietzsche, Henry James and Thackeray bristle with keen observations relating entrenched fears of same-sex relationships to contemporary gay-bashing and obvious displays of heterosexual or “macho” attitudes.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick was an American academician specializing in literary criticism and feminist analysis; she is known as one of the architects of queer theory. Yet it took only 17 years for that same court to strike this decision down.