Fermaova poslednja teorema has ratings and reviews. David said: I was really interested in reading this book after hearing about the problem i. Fermaova poslednja teorema. 2 likes. Book. Fermaova poslednja teorema. Privacy · Terms. About. Fermaova poslednja teorema. Book. 2 people like this topic. Poslednja Fermaova teorema: odgonetanje drevne matematičke zagonetke Poslednja Fermaova teorema: odgonetanje drevne matematičke.
|Published (Last):||24 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||5.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Archived from the original PDF on 13 July I enjoyed it, especially when the author found a common, understandable subject to explain parts of the problem. EdwardsFermat’s Last Theorem. Fermat’s Poslednjq Theorem in fiction.
Fermaova poslednja teorema: priča o zagonetki koja je zbunjivala najveće svetske umove 358 godina
Tough book to write about a very difficult subject. Where it struggles is that it can only give a broad overview of the teprema involved. Faltings G July At the start I thought it was going to be like one of ‘The Knowledge’ books but for adults. Retrieved 15 March Taylor and Wiles’s proof relies on 20th-century techniques.
Category:Fermat’s last theorem
Shalim Hussain rated it it was ok Jun 25, Elements of Number Theory. Tanto Fermat li ha presi tutti in giro, non lo sapeva nemmeno lui.
Simply told yet interesting, the book captures the human drama fairly well, if repetitively. The”Fermat’s Enigma” review by Erica Blum. Simon Lehna Singh, MBE born 1 January is a British author who has specialised in writing about mathematical and scientific topics in an accessible manner. It became a part of the Langlands programmea list of important conjectures needing proof or disproof.
I kept thinking, poslednjw cares? All solutions of this equation were computed by Lenstra in He is the maiden winner of the Lilavati Award.
Juerg rated it it was ok Mar 30, Schlichting, a Wolfskehl reviewer, most of the proofs were based on elementary methods taught in schools, and often submitted by “people with a technical education but a failed career”. Reprinted by New York: Cambridge mathematician Andrew Wiles announced a solution for Fermat’s last theorem in but after a flaw was discovered in the proof, Wiles had to work for another year–he had already laboured in solitude for seven years–to establish that he had solved the year-old problem.
The two papers were vetted and published as the entirety of the May issue of the Annals of Mathematics. Examples include 3, 4, 5 and 5, 12, Attempts to prove it prompted substantial development in number theoryand over time Fermat’s Last Theorem gained prominence as an unsolved problem in mathematics.
Over the next two centuries —the conjecture was proved for only the primes 3, 5, and 7, although Sophie Germain innovated and proved an approach that was relevant to an entire class of primes. Beitrag zum Beweis des Fermatschen Satzes. Fdrmaova popular treatments of the subject state it this way.
Последња Фермаова теорема — Википедија, слободна енциклопедија
Annales de l’Institut Fourier. Or knows were I can buy one? The resulting modularity theorem at the time known as the Taniyama—Shimura conjecture states that every elliptic curve is modularmeaning that it can be associated with a unique modular form.
Why has this theorem been so difficult to prove? Juanita rated it it was ok Apr 25, I guess I am treating Fermat’s Last Theorem as a religious quest that only the humble can achieve and that is my own fault for seeing it that way, but I wish someone a little more humbler solved this puzzle. This is now known as the Pythagorean theoremand a triple of numbers that meets this condition is called a Pythagorean triple — both are named after the ancient Greek Pythagoras.
It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the second, into two like powers. Among other things, these rules required that the proof be published in a peer-reviewed journal; the prize would not be awarded until two years after the publication; and that no prize would be given after 13 Septemberroughly a century after the competition was begun.
Too many digressions, too many equations, I thought the book padded for length, though some of its stories wee highly entertaining.
History of the Theory of Numbers. It contained an error in a bound on the order of a particular group. Chintia Maharani rated it it was ok Apr 09, Hans Flower rated it it was ok Apr 15,