H. M. Edwards’ book Riemann’s Zeta Function  explains the histor- will focus on Riemann’s definition of ζ, the functional equation, and the. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Riemann’s zeta function / H. M. Edwards | Incluye bibliografía e índice }. The Paperback of the Riemann’s Zeta Function by H. M. Edwards at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $ or more!.
|Country:||Turks & Caicos Islands|
|Published (Last):||6 April 2015|
|PDF File Size:||19.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If there’s a different proof I’d love to take a look at it.
Please be polite and civil when commenting, and always follow reddiquette. Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of zets of communities. Also if you could direct me to any good resources about Fourier inversion because I don’t know anything about that and that’s what comes right after this in the Edwards book.
This includes reference requests – also see our lists of recommended books and free online resources. This subreddit is for discussion of mathematical links and questions.
Log in or sign up in seconds.
Harold Edwards (mathematician) – Wikipedia
Click here to chat with us on IRC! Submit a new text post. I don’t know if this is appropriate for this subreddit since there’s rules against posts about learning math, but it’s not a homework question or a practice problem, just something I’m reading on my own, and I’d really like an answer so I can understand the proof of the functional equation.
Image-only posts should be on-topic and should promote discussion; please do not post memes or similar content here. The book has a second proof which involves the theta function, is that what you meant? Please read the FAQ before posting. TeX all the things Chrome extension configure inline math to use [ ; ; ] delimiters.
Functuon be clear, there is nothing wrong with posting this sort of thing here, it’s just that I think you would riemnan more likely to get good responses there. This might help youit helped me when I got to that part of the book. If you can’t find it but are interested I can send a copy to you. Just google “Riemann zeta functional equation proof with theta function” and you should find some notes on it. What Are You Working On? It would work out nicely otherwise.
Submit a new link. I recommend posting this type of question to math stackexchange if you haven’t already.
In u study of this area I found another proof of the functional equation using the theta function edwardx I found much more intuitive than the complex integration method. I’ve read Edouard Goursat’s Functions of a Complex Variable awesome book by the way so I know what the Cauchy integral formula is, but I can’t see how it applies here, or how you would use it to get from one line to riemanh next.
It’s the jump between the second and third lines that confuses me. Everything about X – zeat Wednesday. The second proof of the functional equation did make a lot more sense than the first, but this was the only real problem I hadn’t understanding the first. Here, the z – a in the statement of Cauchy is just the y that appears below the dy. But if I remember correctly that proof should have been given just a few pages before where you are now. This is a tough book to get through but well worth the struggle to understand the rich theory behind Riemann Zeta.
Harold Edwards (mathematician)
I’d recommend you have a look for that, since appreciating the functional equation is a really important step in this theory. The user base is a lot larger, and the site is specifically designed for answering this sort of question.
Just to be clear, g is holomorphic is at the origin but it is a edwarde function globally since n has poles at 2 pi i n. Edwards’ “Riemann’s Zeta Function;” Can someone explain this part to me? Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. General political debate is not permitted.