According to popular accounts, Auschwitz: Technique and operation of the gas chambers, by Jean-Claude Pressac (New York: Beate Klarsfeld Foundation;. We are extremely grateful to The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation for permission to present Jean-Claude Pressac’s extraordinary book AUSCHWITZ: Technique and . Les crématoires d’Auschwitz: la machinerie du meurtre de masse by Jean- Claude Pressac(Book) 17 editions published between and in French .
|Published (Last):||14 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||15.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers is a truly exceptional and puzzling book, a treasure trove of unpublished wartime German documents, which give new insight into numerous heretofore unknown aspects of camp history.
Pressac is a former Revisionist. The men assigned to this task began complaining about the “circus act. Everybody knew they were there. What can be salvaged from it? Pressac certainly blundered with his description of gassings in Crematories IV and V, which according to him took place as follows: Apparently this theory is still prevalent in official ‘Holocaust’ literature. Special requests may be addressed to: You also may like to try some of these bookshopswhich presssac or may not sell this item.
The first problem with the theory is that there is not a shred of documentary or scientific evidence to support farmhouse conversions.
Then the pressaac describes how the SS personnel stationed at Auschwitz are mobilized for combat duty at the front and cancel their requisitions “with noisy protestations of disappointment” which “barely disguise their cowardly general relief.
With this reduction in numbers by the worldwide leading ‘Auschwitz expert,’ the number of six million ‘Holocaust victims’ was less defensible than ever.
Soft cover of Auschwitz: Holocaust deniers have seized on the opportunities created by the Nazi decision to destroy the crematoria in Auschwitz-Birkenau at the end of World War II. Similarly italics will be used in some cases where languages other than English are used, and [italics] when referring to key documents.
Unfortunately he promptly forgot his promise. These places sometimes needed fumigation. Check copyright status Cite this Title Auschwitz: For all his new and improved sources, Pressac remains astoundingly imprecise. Pressac’s new book is, in essence, nothing but a summary of his English-language work.
Jean-Claude Pressac. Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers.
The gas chamber was said to have contained three ovens. Any attempt to prove it scientifically must end in catastrophe for true believers.
As for physical evidence, Pressac points out there is no conclusive or documentary evidence for the widely claimed homicidal gassings in the Auschwitz main camp crematory building. He was determined to scientifically challenge the question of the kean of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz even though he lacked the competence to undertake such a task.
He was warned against the tendency to see “falsehoods” everywhere. Since the existence of these ‘extermination facilities’ is unproven and we would not know, even if they had existed, to what extent they were used, Claudf figures have no scientific value whatsoever. The analysis of material proof convinced him that his former views shaped by the Faurisson case were in error.
The Holocaust according to Jean-Claude Pressac
Thus he made an irreparable breach in exterminationist historiography, because science clearly proves the impossibility of mass exterminations at Auschwitz. In this way you will answer our challenge: Stop showing me a building, a door, a wall or, sometimes, only hair or shoes.
Looking for someone who could refute Leuchter, the opponents of revisionism settled on Pressac. The University of Sydney. They are both challenging.
Technique and operation of the gas chamberssaying that he “nearly did away with [himself] one evening in October in the main camp, the Stammlager, overwhelmed by the evidence and by despair”. The fact that Pressac had challenged the revisionists on their own turf and in effect given them the choice of weapons was unacceptable to many followers of orthodox ‘Holocaust’ lore.